A brief review of complex regional pain syndrome and current management.

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a debilitating chronic pain condition that, although exceedingly rare, carries a significant burden for the affected patient population. The complex and ambiguous pathophysiology of this condition further complicates clinical management and therapeutic interventions. Furthermore, being a diagnosis of exclusion requires a diligent workup to ensure an accurate diagnosis and subsequent targeted management. The development of the Budapest diagnostic criteria helped to consolidate existing definitions of CRPS but extensive work remains in identifying the underlying pathways. Currently, two distinct types are identified by the presence (CRPS type 1) or absence (CRPS type 2) of neuronal injury. Current management directed at this disease is broad and growing, ranging from non-invasive modalities such as physical and psychological therapy to more invasive techniques such as dorsal root ganglion stimulation and potentially amputation. Ideal therapeutic interventions are multimodal in nature to address the likely multifactorial pathological development of CRPS. Regardless, a significant need remains for continued studies to elucidate the pathways involved in developing CRPS as well as more robust clinical trials for various treatment modalities.

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a debilitating and complex condition that places a significant physical, psychological and emotional burden upon afflicted patients necessitating multi-modal approaches to treatment.The development of the Budapest criteria provided a robust and well-tested set of diagnostic criteria to aid clinicians in the diagnosis of CRPS.The pathophysiology of CRPS has been challenging to elucidate with numerous proposed mechanisms, altogether suggesting a multi-factorial process is involved in the development of this condition.Non-invasive treatments for CRPS are essential in addressing the physical limitations this disease can cause as well as addressing the significant psychological burden that involves increased incidence of depression and suicidal ideation.Invasive treatments offer promising results, especially when considering dorsal root ganglion stimulation; however, the need for more robust clinical trials remains, especially when considering a small portion of patients who have refractory CRPS resort to amputation to control their pain symptoms.

A Comprehensive Review of Solriamfetol to Treat Excessive Daytime Sleepiness.

Purpose of Review: This is a comprehensive review of the literature regarding the use of Solriamfetol for excessive daytime sleepiness. It covers the background and current therapeutic approaches to treating excessive daytime sleepiness, the management of common comorbidities, and the existing evidence investigating the use of Solriamfetol for this purpose. Recent Findings: Excessive daytime sleepiness leads to worse quality of life, a medical sequela and significant economic cost. There are multiple phenotypes of excessive daytime sleepiness depending on the comorbidity making treatment challenging. Due to the complexity of etiology there is not a cure for this ailment. Solriamfetol is a norepinephrine/dopamine dual reuptake antagonist that can be used to manage daytime sleepiness. Solriamfetol was first approved by the FDA in 2018 for use in excessive daytime sleepiness associated with obstructive sleep apnea and narcolepsy. Ongoing literature has proved this drug to be a safe and effective alternative pharmacotherapy. Summary: Recent epidemiological data estimate up to one-third of the general adult population suffers from excessive daytime sleepiness. There is no cure to daytime somnolence and current pharmacotherapeutic regimens have worrisome side effect profiles. Solriamfetol is a new class of drug that offers a safe and effective alternative option for clinical providers treating excessive daytime sleepiness.

A Comprehensive Review of Lemborexant to Treat Insomnia.

Purpose of Review: This is a comprehensive review of the literature regarding Lemborexant for the treatment of insomnia. It covers the background and management of insomnia and then reviews the body of existing evidence evaluating the use of Lemborexant for this purpose. Recent Findings: Insomnia leads to significant decreased in quality of life and economic burden due to decreased workplace performance and increased health care costs. Insomnia manifests as a single common pathway of hyperarousal due to a highly complex network of interactions between activation of the sympathetic system and the endocrine system. Lemborexant is a dual orexin 1/2 antagonist that blocks cortical arousal and promotes sleep state transition. Lemborexant was approved by the FDA in 2019 for use in insomnia. It belongs to a class of orexin neuropeptide inhibitors that is growing in popular clinical application. Summary: Insomnia is a crippling disorder of the sleep wake cycle that drives significant morbidity and mortality in the United States. It carries a high societal and economic toll due to direct and indirect effects to the healthcare system. Lemborexant is a new addition to the orexin antagonist class of drugs that already includes Almorexant and Suvorexant that has superior pharmacokinetic properties. While Lemborexant does have a mild side effect profile, its clinical safety and efficacy make it a promising insomnia drug of the future.

Techniques in medicine: ipsilateral transforaminal epidural steroid injection in Bertolotti's syndrome.

Bertolotti's syndrome, also known as lumbosacral transitional vertebrae, is a relatively rare spinal condition characterized by an anatomical variation in the lower spine. Conservative approaches such as physical therapy, anti-inflammatory medications and lifestyle modifications may be recommended for mild cases. In more severe cases or when conservative measures fail to provide relief, injections such as may be considered to alleviate pain. This case is unique in that we document a challenging technique of ipsilateral transforaminal epidural steroid injection in a patient with Bertolotti's syndrome.

An extract of phase II and III trials on recent developments in managing neuropathic pain syndromes: diabetic peripheral neuropathy, trigeminal neuralgia, and postherpetic neuralgia.

INTRODUCTION: Neuropathic pain (NP) conditions involve lesions to the somatosensory nervous system leading to chronic and debilitating pain. Many patients suffering from NP utilize pharmacological treatments with various drugs that seek to reduce pathologic neuronal states. However, many of these drugs show poor efficacy as well as cause significant adverse effects. Because of this, there is a major need for the development of safer and more efficacious drugs to treat NP. AREAS COVERED: In this review, we analyzed current treatments being developed for a variety of NP conditions. Specifically, we sought drugs in phase II/III clinical trials with indications for NP conditions. Various databases were searched including Google Scholar, PubMed, and clinicaltrials.gov. EXPERT OPINION: All the mentioned targets for treatments of NP seem to be promising alternatives for existing treatments that often possess poor side effect profiles for patients. However, gene therapy potentially offers the unique ability to inject a plasmid containing growth factors leading to nerve growth and repair. Because of this, gene therapy appears to be the most intriguing new treatment for NP.

Recent Advances in Management of Neuropathic, Nociceptive, and Chronic Pain: A Narrative Review with Focus on Nanomedicine, Gene Therapy, Stem Cell Therapy, and Newer Therapeutic Options.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This manuscript summarizes novel clinical and interventional approaches in the management of chronic, nociceptive, and neuropathic pain. RECENT FINDINGS: Pain can be defined as a feeling of physical or emotional distress caused by an external stimulus. Pain can be grouped into distinct types according to characteristics including neuropathic pain, which is a pain caused by disease or lesion in the sensory nervous system; nociceptive pain, which is pain that can be sharp, aching, or throbbing and is caused by injury to bodily tissues; and chronic pain, which is long lasting or persisting beyond 6 months. With improved understanding of different signaling systems for pain in recent years, there has been an upscale of methods of analgesia to counteract these pathological processes. Novel treatment methods such as use of cannabinoids, stem cells, gene therapy, nanoparticles, monoclonal antibodies, and platelet-rich plasma have played a significant role in improved strategies for therapeutic interventions. Although many management options appear to be promising, extensive additional clinical research is warranted to determine best practice strategies in the future for clinicians.

Pain Scales: What Are They and What Do They Mean.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: It is essential to have validated and reliable pain measurement tools that cover a wide range of areas and are tailored to individual patients to ensure effective pain management. The main objective of this review is to provide comprehensive information on commonly used pain scales and questionnaires, including their usefulness, intended purpose, applicability to different patient populations, and associated advantages and disadvantages. RECENT FINDINGS: Acute pain questionnaires typically focus on measuring the severity of pain and the extent of relief achieved through interventions. Chronic pain questionnaires evaluate additional aspects such as pain-related functional limitations, psychological distress, and psychological well-being. The selection of an appropriate pain scale depends on the specific assessment objectives. Additionally, each pain scale has its strengths and limitations. Understanding the differences among these pain scales is essential for selecting the most appropriate tool tailored to individual patient needs in different settings. CONCLUSION: Medical professionals encounter challenges in accurately assessing pain. Physicians must be familiar with the different pain scales and their applicability to specific patient population.

Complications of Spinal Cord Stimulators-A Comprehensive Review Article.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Spinal cord stimulation has been increasing in influence as an option to regulate pain, especially in the chronic pain patient population. However, even with the numerous changes made to this technology since its inception, it is still prone to various complications such as hardware issues, neurological injury/epidural hematoma, infections, and other biological concerns. The purpose of this article is to thoroughly review and evaluate literature pertaining to the complications associated with percutaneous spinal cord stimulation. RECENT FINDINGS: Lead migration is generally the most common complication of percutaneous spinal cord stimulation; however, recent utilization of various anchoring techniques has been discussed and experienced clinical success in decreasing the prevalence of lead migration and lead fractures. With newer high-frequency systems gaining traction to improve pain management and decrease complications as compared to traditional systems, rechargeable implantable pulse generators have been the preferred power source. However, recent findings may suggest that these rechargeable implantable pulse generators do not significantly increase battery life as much as was proposed. Intraoperative neuromonitoring has seen success in mitigating neurological injury postoperatively and may see more usage in the future through more testing. Though the occurrence of infection and biological complications, including dural puncture and skin erosion, has been less frequent over time, they should still be treated in accordance with established protocols. While many complications can arise following percutaneous spinal cord stimulator implantation, the procedure is less invasive than open implantation and has seen largely positive patient feedback. Hardware complications, the more common issues that can occur, rarely indicate a serious risk and can generally be remedied through reoperation. However, less common cases such as neurological injury, infections, and biological complications require prompt diagnosis to improve the condition of the patient and prevent significant damage.

Vigabatrin (Sabril) for the Treatment of Refractory Complex Focal Seizures in Adults: Pharmacologic and Clinical Considerations.

To review the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and adverse effects of vigabatrin (Sabril) and its role in managing refractory focal unaware seizures in adults. In the present investigation, a search of English-language literature from 1999 through 2023 was conducted using vigabatrin and Sabril as search terms to identify relevant studies and review articles. A 2000 double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study found that out of 90 adult patients, 48% of those treated with vigabatrin achieved a 50% or greater reduction in the frequency of complex partial seizures, compared to 26% of placebo-treated patients. This study also observed that vigabatrin was well tolerated by 72.4% of patients, with the most common side effects being drowsiness, dizziness, headache, and fatigue. Further studies with a significant risk of vigabatrin-associated visual field loss necessitate vigabatrin only being an option for refractory cases. Additional studies suggest that despite the potential risk of vision loss and adverse effects, adult patients continue to use vigabatrin long-term. Sabril is an antiepileptic medication prescribed as an additional treatment for refractory complex partial seizures in patients at least ten years old who have not responded well to other alternative therapies. Multiple clinical trials indicate that Sabril sufficiently reduces the frequency of seizures when used as an adjunct treatment of refractory complex focal seizures. However, it is important to carefully monitor patients for any adverse effects, particularly long-term use, and to discontinue the drug if serious side effects occur.

Infigratinib for the Treatment of Metastatic or Locally Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma With Known FGFR2 Gene Fusions or Rearrangements.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is an aggressive and diverse malignancy with a poor prognosis. Related to a typical indolent course of progression, most cases of CCA are metastatic or locally advanced at the time of presentation. For patients with nonresectable tumors or metastatic disease, the mainstay of treatment is comprehensive with combination chemotherapy. The first-line chemotherapeutic combination for the treatment of CCA are cisplatin and gemcitabine-based chemotherapies. However, many locally advanced and progressive CCA cases are refractory to first-line management. Within the past few years, the increase in the incidence of metastatic CCA and its poor prognosis has brought to light the need for novel therapeutic approaches to treatment. With advancements in next-generation genome sequencing, multiple molecular pathways have been identified in the pathogenesis of CCA and have shown great potential as alternative treatments in cases of CCA refractory to surgical resection. FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements have been identified in 10-16% of all intrahepatic CCA and are thought to serve as a pathway of resistance for a number of nonresectable and refractory cases of cholangiocarcinoma. A novel therapeutic agent that has been discussed is infigratinib, a selective, ATP-competitive inhibitor of fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2). In a phase 1 trial, infigratinib showed a safe profile and showed remarkable clinical efficacy in advanced CCA with FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements in phase II trials. As of May 2021, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved infigratinib for CCA largely based on tumor response and duration of response. As of 2021, infigratinib, futibatinib, and pemigatinib, similar novel selective FGFR inhibitors, have been approved by the FDA for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic CCA harboring FGFR2 gene mutations. The present investigation reviews the development of infigratinib in particular and its clinical efficacy compared to other available treatment options for cholangiocarcinoma. While the side effect profile of infigratinib is minimal, particularly GI side effects, when compared with futibatinib and pemigatinib, the overall response rate (ORR) and median overall survival (mOS) for infigratinib (ORR=23.1%, mOS=3.8 months) was significantly lower than futibatinib (ORR=35.8%, mOS=21.1 months) and pemigatinib (ORR=35.5%, mOS=21.1 months). While there is ample promise for the use of infigratinib as molecular-directed therapy in the treatment of CCA harboring FGFR2 mutations, there is an appropriate concern for patient-acquired resistance. The heterogeneous nature of FGFR mutations and the emergence of different resistance mechanisms emphasize a need for more agents to inhibit FGFR rearrangements effectively.

The Effects of Opioid Dependency Use on Postoperative Spinal Surgery Outcomes: A Review of the Available Literature.

There is a lack of evidence to support the effectiveness of long-term opioid therapy in patients with chronic, noncancer pain. Despite these findings, opioids continue to be the most commonly prescribed drug to treat chronic back pain and many patients undergoing spinal surgery have trialed opioids before surgery for conservative pain management. Unfortunately, preoperative opioid use has been shown repeatedly in the literature to negatively affect spinal surgery outcomes. In this review article, we identify and summarize the main postoperative associations with preoperative opioid use that have been found in previously published studies by searching on PubMed, Google Scholar, Medline, and ScienceDirect; using keywords: Opioid dependency, postoperative, spinal surgery, specifically (1) increased postoperative chronic opioid use (24 studies); (2) decreased return to work (RTW) rates (8 studies); (3) increased length of hospital stay (LOS) (9 studies); and (4) increased healthcare costs (8 studies). The conclusions from these studies highlight the importance of recognizing patients on opioids preoperatively to effectively risk stratify and identify those who will benefit most from multidisciplinary counseling and guidance.

Buprenorphine for Chronic Pain Management: a Narrative Review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this review is to educate healthcare professionals regarding buprenorphine for the use of opioid use disorder (OUD) as well as for chronic pain management. This review provides physicians and practitioners with updated information regarding the distinct characteristics and intricacies of prescribing buprenorphine. RECENT FINDINGS: Buprenorphine is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for acute pain, chronic pain, opioid use disorder (OUD), and opioid dependence. When compared to most other opioids, buprenorphine offers superior patient tolerability, an excellent half-life, and minimal respiratory depression. Buprenorphine does have notable side effects as well as pharmacokinetic properties that require special attention, especially if patients require future surgical interventions. Many physicians are not trained to initiate or manage patients on buprenorphine. However, buprenorphine offers a potentially safer alternative for medication management for patients who require chronic opioid therapy for pain or have OUD. This review provides updated information on buprenorphine for both chronic pain and OUD.

Topical Cocaine Hydrochloride Nasal Solution: Anesthetic and Surgical Considerations.

Adequate surgical view during various types of nasal procedures is essential for surgical operations to be performed in a safe, efficient, and successful manner. Minimizing bleeding during surgery is an important way of increasing visualization that is commonly achieved by using a vasoconstrictive agent to control intraoperative hemorrhage. Many otolaryngologists choose to employ topical cocaine to minimize bleeding during surgery owing to its vasoconstrictive properties, while simultaneously benefitting from its dual local anesthetic effects. The relative benefit of topical cocaine for otolaryngologic procedures when compared to other topical analgesics and vasoconstrictors remains a topic of discussion due to the multiple potential cardiac and central nervous system side effects associated with cocaine administration. Furthermore, there is not a scientifically backed maximal safe dose published; instead, most of the guidelines for intranasal cocaine use are based on untested clinical practice. Despite this, the short latency, adequate duration of action, and inherent vasoconstrictive and decongestive capabilities make cocaine a valuable anesthetic agent for use in clinical procedures. As the relative benefit of using topical cocaine compared to the use of other vasoconstrictors and analgesics for nasal procedures remains undetermined in the current literature, this leaves the need for a comprehensive review of research that explores the risks and benefits of using topical cocaine in nasal procedures based on clinical trials that compare intranasal cocaine with various other analgesics and vasoconstrictors.

Oral Therapeutics Post Menopausal Osteoporosis.

Osteoporosis affects a significant number of postmenopausal women in the United States. Screening is performed using clinical assessments and bone mineral density scans via dual x-ray absorptiometry. Oral therapy is indicated to prevent pathologic fractures in those deemed at increased risk following screening. Bisphosphonates including alendronate, ibandronate, and risedronate are currently first-line oral therapeutics in fracture prevention following the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Hormonal therapies include estrogen-containing therapies, selective estrogen receptor modulators, and other compounds that mimic the effects of estrogen such as tibolone. Lifestyle modifications such as supplementation and physical activity may also contribute to the prevention of osteoporosis and are used as adjuncts to therapy following diagnosis. These therapeutics are limited primarily by their adverse effects. Treatment regimens should be tailored based on significant risk factors demonstrated by patients, adverse effects, and clinical response to treatment. The most severe risk factors relevant to pharmacological selection involve hormone replacement therapies, where concern for venous thrombosis, coronary artery disease, breast, and uterine cancer exist. Bisphosphonates are most commonly associated with gastrointestinal discomfort which may be mitigated with proper administration. Although adverse effects exist, these medications have proven to be efficacious in the prevention of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in post-menopausal women. Fracture risk should be weighed against the risk of adverse events associated with each of the regimens, with clinical judgment dictating the treatment approach centered around patient goals and experiences.

Stigmatization as a Barrier to Urologic Care: A Review.

Heavy societal stigma of certain conditions has created an environment where individuals may be hesitant to seek professional care. Urology is a specialized field that focuses on many of these conditions that society has deemed taboo to discuss. In this review, we address barriers that have prevented patients from seeking urologic care in order to better understand and elucidate important concerns within development of the physician-patient relationship. Recognizing these concerns can also assist in public health outreach approaches to motivate patients for seeking urologic care. The scope of this review was limited to three highly prevalent conditions affecting both men and women, including urinary incontinence, erectile dysfunction, and genitourinary syndrome of menopause.

Lyme Disease and Post-treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome: Current and Developing Treatment Options.

Lyme disease and its treatment implications have become an ever-increasing area of concern within the United States related to the markedly increased prevalence of infection within the last two decades. The presentation, pathophysiology, and epidemiology of Lyme disease have been well studied, and thus treatments for this disease are widely available. While the treatment of its early and late stages is relatively simple with 10-14 day and four-week courses of doxycycline, respectively, the main problem rests in the understanding of the etiology and pathology of post-treatment Lyme disease syndrome (PTLDS). With the time of symptoms onsetting approximately six months after treatment and potentially lasting indefinitely, this syndrome's effect on patients' quality of life could be devastating. Searching on PubMed, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, and ScienceDirect using keywords including Lyme disease, PTLDS, doxycycline, erythema migrans, azlocillin, and treatment, the authors have tried to make clear the different aspects. The authors have reviewed and discussed clinical studies of Lyme disease and its treatments/potential therapeutics as well as PTLDS and its sparse treatments/potential therapeutics.

Teprotumumab-trbw as a Novel Monoclonal Antibody for Thyroid Eye Disease: A Literature Review.

Thyroid eye disease (TED) can cause disfigurement and vision loss, most commonly in patients with Graves' disease. These symptoms are related to orbital inflammation subsequently cause proptosis and limited eye movement. Traditionally, TED is treated with corticosteroids to decrease inflammation and surgery once the disease stabilizes. However, multiple medications that play a role in immune modulation have been tested and found to be beneficial in treating TED, either as an adjuvant to steroids or in severe disease resistant to steroids. Teprotumumab-trbw, a novel monoclonal antibody sold under the trade name Tepezza®, is the first immune modulator to be approved by the Unites States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for TED. Teprotumumab-trbw targets the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor, which is upregulated on orbital fibroblasts and decreases activation in patients with TED. The FDA approved this drug for patients with less than nine months of disease duration and high levels of disease activity. Multiple studies have shown significant positive results in disease modulation, as well as limited side effects.

Arts Therapy and Its Implications in Chronic Pain Management: A Narrative Review.

Chronic nonmalignant pain is recognized as a complex, dynamic, phenomenological interplay between biological, psychological, and social factors that are individual to the person suffering from it. Therefore, its management and treatment ought to entail the individual's biopsychosocial aspects that are often addressed by collaborative, inter/multidisciplinary multimodal care, as there is no biologic treatment. In an effort to enhance inter/multidisciplinary multimodal care, a narrative review of arts therapy as a mind-body intervention and its efficacy in chronic pain populations has been conducted. Changes in emotional and physical symptoms, especially pain intensity, during arts therapy sessions have also been discussed in in the context of attention distraction strategy. Arts therapy (visual art, music, dance/movement therapy, etc.) have been investigated to summarize relevant findings and to highlight further potential benefits, limitations, and future directions in this area. We reviewed 16 studies of different design, and the majority reported beneficial effects of art therapy in patients' management of chronic pain and improvement in pain, mood, stress, and quality of life. However, the results are inconsistent and unclear. It was discovered that there is a limited amount of high-quality research available on the implications of arts therapy in chronic nonmalignant pain management. Due to the reported limitations, low effectiveness, and inconclusive findings of arts therapy in the studies conducted so far, further research with improved methodological standards is required.

Analgesic Techniques for Rib Fractures-A Comprehensive Review Article.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Rib fractures are a common traumatic injury that has been traditionally treated with systemic opioids and non-opioid analgesics. Due to the adverse effects of opioid analgesics, regional anesthesia techniques have become an increasingly promising alternative. This review article aims to explore the efficacy, safety, and constraints of medical management and regional anesthesia techniques in alleviating pain related to rib fractures. RECENT FINDINGS: Recently, opioid analgesia, thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA), and paravertebral block (PVB) have been favored options in the pain management of rib fractures. TEA has positive analgesic effects, and many studies vouch for its efficacy; however, it is contraindicated for many patients. PVB is a viable alternative to those with contraindications to TEA and exhibits promising outcomes compared to other regional anesthesia techniques; however, a failure rate of up to 10% and adverse complications challenge its administration in trauma settings. Serratus anterior plane blocks (SAPB) and erector spinae blocks (ESPB) serve as practical alternatives to TEA or PVB with lower incidences of adverse effects while exhibiting similar levels of analgesia. ESPB can be performed by trained emergency physicians, making it a feasible procedure to perform that is low-risk and efficient in pain management. Compared to the other techniques, intercostal nerve block (ICNB) had less analgesic impact and required concurrent intravenous medication to achieve comparable outcomes to the other blocks. The regional anesthesia techniques showed great success in improving pain scores and expediting recovery in many patients. However, choosing the optimal technique may not be so clear and will depend on the patient's case and the team's preferences. The peripheral nerve blocks have impressive potential in the future and may very well surpass neuraxial techniques; however, further research is needed to prove their efficacy and weaknesses.

Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Depression: A Review.

Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) are frequently present in the general population as patients age with approximately a third of individuals experiencing LUTS during their lifetime. LUTS can be further defined as having any of the following symptoms: urinary hesitancy, straining, nocturia, increased urination frequency, and dysuria. LUTS has the potential for patients to contribute their symptoms to what can normally occur as we age. This can lead to a decrease in patients seeking care and could negatively impact patients' health-related quality of life (HRQL). In conjunction with LUTS, we obtained from our analysis that LUTS and depression are closely related and worsening depressive symptoms may increase the severity of LUTS. We also discerned three categories of factors that can yield major depression namely adversity, internalizing, and externalizing factors. Within these categories, trauma, social support, genetic factors, and minimal education appeared to increase the risk of depression in patients. With the recent increase in mental health awareness and more access to mental health care amid the COVID-19 Pandemic, further screening, and collaboration between providers to treat both urological and psychiatric symptoms could improve patient outcomes. It is important for providers to have an increased understanding of the mental and physical impact both LUTS and depression can have on patients' wellbeing. This has the potential to help patients be more open about their symptoms with the aim of better addressing LUTS and depression to positively impact their HRQL.